Website Health Audit
I'm a senior software engineer with over 9 years of experience. I'll go through your site the same way your users do. I check accessibility, performance, and how it holds up on every screen size, then give you a clear plan your team can actually work from.
Manual review beyond automated scans
Remove barriers before they become blockers.
I go through your key pages with a keyboard, a screen reader, and the WCAG 2.2 AA guidelines. I look at forms, focus, contrast, and all the little things that can make a site hard (or impossible) for some people to use.
Find what makes the experience feel slow.
I dig into Core Web Vitals, JavaScript, images, and fonts to find what's actually slowing things down. Then I rank the fixes by how much your users will notice them, not just by what's easiest to measure.
Make every breakpoint feel intentional.
I test your navigation, forms, and layouts across real screen sizes, including the awkward in-between ones. Tiny tap targets and layouts that break at certain widths are easy to miss, and automated tools rarely catch them.
Deliverables
Share your URL, key journeys, and business priorities.
I review the agreed pages and document what matters.
Your team gets a practical backlog, walkthrough, and optional follow-on help.
Fixed scope and price agreed before work begins
from $1,500
Focused WCAG 2.2 AA review of agreed pages and journeys.
Request a proposal for an Accessibility Auditfrom $1,000
Core Web Vitals diagnosis with a prioritized improvement plan.
Request a proposal for a Performance Auditfrom $2,500
Accessibility, performance, and responsiveness in one report.
Request a proposal for a Full Frontend Health AuditAvailable add-ons: remediation implementation, re-testing, and monthly monitoring.
Final scope depends on site size and complexity.
Who you'll work with
I'm Anker Peet, a software engineer with 9+ years of professional experience.
My favorite part of being a software engineer has always been building user interfaces that are functional and accessible. Now I help other teams do the same. I'll tell you what's broken, why it matters, and what your team should fix first.
More about meArticles
A green Lighthouse score is nice, but it doesn't mean people can actually use your site. Here's what the scanners miss.
Largest Contentful Paint: how long it takes for the biggest image or block of text on the screen to show up. Good is 2.5 seconds or less., Interaction to Next Paint: how quickly the page visibly responds when someone clicks, taps, or types. Good is 200 milliseconds or less., and Cumulative Layout Shift: how much the content jumps around while the page loads. Good is a score of 0.1 or less. in plain English, plus the fixes that usually make the biggest difference.
Send me your site, your goals, and anything you already know is broken. I'll get back to you with a recommendation and a fixed-price proposal.
Typical turnaround: about two weeks after scope and access are confirmed.